Relativity, the Chicago-based legal data intelligence company best known for the e-discovery and litigation platform RelativityOne, has acquired Gavel, the Los Angeles-based document automation and AI drafting company founded by Dorna Moini (pictured above).

Relativity said the move will enable it to extend Relativity’s AI platform into the place where lawyers actually write, Microsoft Word.

Work product generated inside RelativityOne and its Relativity aiR products — including aiR for Case Strategy and aiR Assist — could be opened, drafted, edited, redlined and finalized in Word, with each change syncing back to the underlying matter in RelativityOne, the company said.

“We would be taking the system of action that lawyers already rely on and extending it into the surfaces where they actually do the work,” said Chris Brown, chief product officer at Relativity.

The companies did not disclose financial terms.

The rationale makes sense. Relativity’s platform has long served as a leading platform for working with the evidence and data at the center of a matter. But the documents that flow out of that work — think motions, briefs, contracts, etc. — live in Word, disconnected from the data and context that shaped them.

By acquiring Gavel, Relativity can close that loop, keeping drafting tethered to the matter rather than letting it drift off into a separate location or application.

“We believe that Relativity’s role as a driving force in legal AI innovation requires investing in the technology and people that create real value for our customers and partners,” said Phil Saunders, CEO of Relativity. “We’re delivering on that through Rel Labs, our partnership and startup investment program, and strategic moves like this one.”

The Gavel team, including Moini and Chief Technology Officer Pierre Martin, who joined Gavel in 2022 after holding engineering leadership roles at Microsoft and Amazon, moves to Relativity.

Relativity says its immediate focus is continuity, and that it intends to keep Gavel running as usual while folding its capabilities into RelativityOne over time.

“Joining Relativity gives us an unrivaled opportunity to scale our shared vision for the industry, build faster and bring our technology to more legal teams,” Moini said.

‘TurboTax for Domestic Violence Survivors’

I have covered Gavel since literally the day it launched in 2017 and through nearly every stage of its evolution, and it is a fascinating story of how a legal tech company evolves over time.

Moini was a litigator at Sidley Austin in San Francisco when she left in 2017 to build what she first called HelpSelf Legal, calling it a “TurboTax for domestic violence survivors.” The original idea was focused on access to justice by using automation to help self-represented litigants navigate legal processes they otherwise could not afford a lawyer to handle.

That underlying automation engine drew interest from other corners of the legal industry and led her to pivot the following year, rebranding as Documate and reorienting around no-code document automation for law firms and legal organizations.

Dorna Moini presents at the 2019 Startup Alley pitch competition at ABA Techshow.

I had an early look at the company in that incarnation when, in March 2019, Documate was one of the 15 startups that pitched in the third annual Startup Alley Pitch Competition at ABA TECHSHOW, the competition I help organize and moderate each year.

Over the next several years, Documate became a leader in document automation, at a time when that category was one of legal tech’s most crowded segments. Its customers ranged from legal aid programs and courts to the do-it-yourself divorce company Hello Divorce and the law firm Wilson Sonsini, whose summer associates built tools on the platform.

Moini also partnered with Northwestern law professor Dan Linna on the Law for Everyone Challenge, which paid law students to build legal tech applications on Documate.

In early 2023, Documate rebranded again, this time to Gavel. When Moini walked me through the change ahead of the announcement, and later on my LawNext podcast, she described it as a reflection of where customers were already taking the product.

They were no longer just automating individual documents, she said, they were building full, end-to-end legal products — packaging legal services for clients the way a software company ships a product.

“There’s an estimate that within the next 10 years, 90% of legal services are going to be delivered online,” she told me at the time. The Documate name, she said, had come to feel limiting. Gavel was meant to invoke a trusted process.

Then came AI. In May 2025, Gavel launched Gavel Exec, a Word-based AI assistant for contract review and drafting, pitched as performing at a senior-lawyer level for small firms and grounded in firm-specific playbooks and precedent.

Notably, even as that AI product grew, Gavel did not abandon its roots. In December 2025, with the release of Gavel Workflows, the company doubled down on rules-based automation.

“Not every legal document should be created by AI,” Moini said then. “When the document’s structure is known, rules-based automation is faster, safer, and more accurate.”

By April of this year, Gavel had pushed Gavel Exec out of the Word add-in and onto the web, launching a web-based contract review and drafting product that included batch contract analysis, market benchmarking, and a hybrid search architecture combining semantic and full-text retrieval.

At that point the company reported it was used by nearly 2,000 legal organizations across 23 countries. Today’s announcement puts the figure at 28 countries.

Will Gavel’s Product Approach Continue?

Had anyone asked me to predict a potential acquirer of Gavel, Relativity would have been nowhere on my list. But now that the deal is done, I can certainly see how it makes sense for Relativity and how it can benefit the company’s customers. On the flip side, I can also see how Relativity’s bankroll and engineering chops can drive Gavel to a higher level of functionality.

Even so, one thing that makes this acquisition interesting is not the strategic fit, but rather the very different cultural and product backgrounds of the two companies.

Gavel built its reputation on a deliberately product-led, self-serve, no-code model. Lawyers could sign up for Gavel without a sales call or a credit card and start using it with little or no training. It has been an approach that has made Gavel a popular product among solos and smaller law firms.

By contrast, Relativity’s customers are the world’s largest law firms, corporations and government agencies, and its sales cycle reflects the enterprise market in which it lives.

So that raises the question of what happens to Gavel’s accessible, self-serve model inside a company built for the enterprise. Will lawyers still be able to swipe a credit card and start drafting, or does Gavel’s reach narrow as it scales up?

And what happens to Gavel’s customers in the solo, small-firm and legal aid markets, when Relativity’s goal is to connect its AI tools to automation tools within Word?

For now, Relativity says Gavel will keep operating as it has. We will have to wait and see what comes later in terms of products, pricing and customers.

Something else worth watching here is the access-to-justice angle. Gavel began as a tool to help domestic violence survivors get justice and it has continued to have strong ties to the legal aid and A2J communities.

Relativity is, by contrast, a dominant power in high-end litigation technology serving large law firms and corporate enterprises. To its credit, however, it has committed to supporting pro bono and academic programs, and it has put its money where its mouth is in various ways, including through its Justice for Change initiative and free academic access.

So with Gavel’s A2J heritage and Relativity’s demonstated A2J commitment, perhaps there are opportunties here for the combined companies to do even more in this area. I certainly hope so.

Photo of Bob Ambrogi Bob Ambrogi

Bob is a lawyer, veteran legal journalist, and award-winning blogger and podcaster. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring “the law’s smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders.” Earlier in his career, he was editor-in-chief of several legal publications, including The National Law Journal, and editorial director of ALM’s Litigation Services Division.